{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/apr/13", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/apr/13/representation-of-edinburgh", "section": "representation-of-edinburgh", "cue_text": "a laugh", "preceding_text": "on upon the empire at large, or that it had inflicted any practical mischief upon the particular country which was alleged to be the sufferer by it. He had not heard of one Englishman who had successfully entrenched himself in the boroughs of that country. He begged pardon—he understood that on one occasion, Mr. Fox, banished from Westmin- 184 ster, had fled for refuge to the electors of Kirkwall "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/apr/13", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/apr/13/representation-of-edinburgh", "section": "representation-of-edinburgh", "cue_text": "a laugh", "preceding_text": "sentation with her own children, was accustomed to send others of them to fill up the representation of the vacant boroughs of England.— Nay, the very motion which the House was then discussing came from a gentleman of Scotland, who had snugly nestled himself into an English borough, and who, having so nestled himself, came forward with true filial piety to reform the abuses of his mother country "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/apr/13", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/apr/13/representation-of-edinburgh", "section": "representation-of-edinburgh", "cue_text": "cries of \"move, move,\" from the opposition benches", "preceding_text": "reform, he could amend the motion of the hon. and learned member for Calne in a manner to which that hon. and learned member could not possibly object. He would not move such an amendment, because he was not an advocate for that measure; but if he were an advocate for it, he would move to insert in the original motion the words, \"the borough of Calne\" instead of the words, \"the city of Edinburgh\" "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/apr/13", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/apr/13/westminster-abbey", "section": "westminster-abbey", "cue_text": "cries of \"order, order!\"", "preceding_text": "he titles to property to be produced in that House; and, therefore, if he stood alone, he should resist the present motion. § Mr. Hume declared that the substance, but not the form, of his intended motions had been preserved in the Order-book; and he must say, that he was surprised at the presuming and extraordinary manner in which he had been remarked on by the right hon. gentleman opposite "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/apr/14", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/apr/14/education-in-ireland-petition-of-roman", "section": "education-in-ireland-petition-of-roman", "cue_text": "Cries of no! no!", "preceding_text": "nvited, and were the occasion of much disturbance, on some occasions; attended with no little danger to the pro- 235 motors of such meetings. He could give one instance in which at a public Bible meeting at Carlow, the priests attended supported by an immense mob, from whose violence some of the friends of the Bible society were obliged to fly with their lives: some escaped by getting over walls. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/dec/08", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/dec/08/case-of-colonel-bradley", "section": "case-of-colonel-bradley", "cue_text": "hear, hear", "preceding_text": "the most simple fact, he must leave the hon. gentleman to that impenetrable darkness which dwelt within the interior of his brain, and leave his statements to the judgment of other gentlemen whom he had the honour of addressing. It was a matter of indifference to him whether the hon. gentleman understood him or not. He addressed himself to the House of Commons, not to the hon. member for Aberdeen "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/dec/12", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/dec/12/address-on-the-kings-message-respecting", "section": "address-on-the-kings-message-respecting", "cue_text": "a laugh", "preceding_text": "n; the presence of which alone enabled the king of Spain to do either good or evil? It was well known that the king of Spain could not maintain himself even for a few weeks without, the assistance of the French troops. Let not the House be led away by the eloquence of the right hon. gentleman. He had talked about letting \"slip the dogs of war.\" They were already let slip. They were on their march "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/dec/12", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/dec/12/address-on-the-kings-message-respecting", "section": "address-on-the-kings-message-respecting", "cue_text": "cheers", "preceding_text": "safe or practicable. He was not an advocate for a crusade in support of liberal opinions. We had quite enough to do to look after our own interests: but here our ally, our ancient ally, had been attacked, and for no other reason than because she had a free constitution. If Portugal had been a despotism there would have been no attack; but Portugal had a free constitution, and that was the offence "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/dec/12", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/dec/12/address-on-the-kings-message-respecting", "section": "address-on-the-kings-message-respecting", "cue_text": "hear, hear.", "preceding_text": "act under which we stood bound to Portugal. We had renewed that same treaty with Portugal in the seventeenth century; again in the eighteenth century—in the beginning of it; and again even in the year 1815— lately—but a few years back—since the hon. members for Aberdeen and for Dorsetshire, who now objected to its performance, had borne conspicuous parts in the public transactions of this country "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/dec/12", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/dec/12/address-on-the-kings-message-respecting", "section": "address-on-the-kings-message-respecting", "cue_text": "hear, hear", "preceding_text": "in debate? The House did not stop to ask—was this true, or was it to be doubted? They had better authority than letters or newspapers, writers at home, or correspondents abroad. They had the real authority—the only authority upon which they could be called 384 on, in such a case, to presume truth, or to proceed — the responsibility, the official responsibility, of the right hon. Secretary himself "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/dec/13", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/dec/13/newspapers-and-pamphlets-stamp-duties-on", "section": "newspapers-and-pamphlets-stamp-duties-on", "cue_text": "hear, hear.", "preceding_text": "bill, the leading principle of which was, to allow defendants in all cases, whether civil or 404 criminal, to give notice to the opposite side, of the line of defence meant to be adopted, and to give in evidence the truth, not that it might be pleaded in all cases as a justification, but that in all cases it might weigh with the jury, in order to show the motives by which defendants were actuated "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/feb/17", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/feb/17/conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "section": "conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "cue_text": "hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "em, because some arrangement had been made; and he much doubted whether his learned friend himself had not been, in the course of his practice, a party to them. If the House were now to abandon the charge, it would require no explanation; because every man of discrimination and understanding would always see on the face of the accusation ample and manifest reasons for relinquishing the proceeding "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/feb/17", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/feb/17/conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "section": "conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "cue_text": "The Witness was directed to withdraw.", "preceding_text": "this affair of the sheep?—I should think somewhere about six or seven. I really cannot remember the year. § You have been a magistrate a good many years for the county of Surrey?—Yes, a great many years. § And residing in the neighbourhood of Franks?—Yes. § Was Franks ever brought before you, as a magistrate?—Never; I never heard his name mentioned before me as a magistrate. § "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/feb/17", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/feb/17/conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "section": "conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "cue_text": "The Witness was directed to withdraw.", "preceding_text": "nd industrious man?—I know nothing in respect to Franks's character; for at the time our sheep were stolen, 516 those sheep that were stolen out of the turnips, when the paper was found, I scarcely knew there was such a man except by name. § Since that time, have you ever had dealings with Franks?—Yes; I think the sheep were stolen in April, in the November following I sold him a sow. § "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/feb/17", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/feb/17/conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "section": "conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "cue_text": "The Witness was directed to withdraw.", "preceding_text": "re that the children did not make use of any ill language to any of Mr. Kenrick's people, though I was sent away. § Did you ever express any gratitude to Mr. Kenrick, or his bailiff, or any of his people, for his conduct to you in the course of that prosecution?—Not at all. § Is your wife here?—I do not know that she is, unless she has come in by the coach since I came down here. § "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/feb/17", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/feb/17/conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "section": "conduct-of-mr-kenrick-in-the-case-of", "cue_text": "The Witness was directed to withdraw.", "preceding_text": "ost. § \"Yours truly, § \"Broom, Dorking. W. KENRICK.\" § Did you transmit that letter to lord Middle-ton?—I did. § Lord Middleton was the chairman of the sessions, was he not?—He was. § Did you receive an answer from lord Middleton?—I received an immediate answer from lord Middleton. § In the negative?—Yes. § And you communicated that to Mr. Kenrick?—I did. § "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1826/mar/21", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/mar/21/first-fruits-in-ireland", "section": "first-fruits-in-ireland", "cue_text": "hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "t hon. baronet stated, that the archbishops of Ireland did not pay an equal portion of first-fruits with those of England; and therefore he proposed going into a committee to throw back 52 upon the Irish clergy a burthen which ought always to be borne by the public at large. He could consider the resolutions of the right hon. baronet in no other light than as an attack upon the established church "}