{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/apr/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/apr/01/the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "section": "the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "cue_text": "\" Hear, hear,\" from the Opposition Benches.", "preceding_text": "y were bound to shew that they had a right to deal with this fund as with any tax levied upon the Irish people. Suppose the property to amount to 100,000 l. —and he would ask—was there one man in that House who would say that he thought it fit to raise 100,000 l. per annum (he took it at the smallest point) from the people of Ireland merely for the purposes of their moral and religious education? "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/apr/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/apr/01/the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "section": "the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "cue_text": "An Hon. Member said, 20,000 l.", "preceding_text": "uld not be more than 22,000 l. or 23,000 l. It was worth while for the House to consider what was the amount of Irish Church property. That amount could be ascertained from various Parliamentary papers then on the Table. It was not far short of, if it did not amount to, 800,000 l. He said yes. Ministers' money had never been included in the calculation, and that amounted to 12,000 l. or 14,000 l. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/apr/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/apr/01/the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "section": "the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "cue_text": "An Hon. Member. —\"You forget the deduction made by the Tithe Bill.\"", "preceding_text": "r if the House would only examine the purposes to which that fund was to be applied, it would see that it was an Ecclesiastical fund under the administration of Ecclesiastical Commissioners. He asserted 578 then that the amount of Irish Church-property exceeded 800,000 l. His hon. and gallant Friend said no; and he would soon have an opportunity of showing whether his contradiction were corrrect. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/apr/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/apr/01/the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "section": "the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "cue_text": "\" Hear hear!\" from the Opposition.", "preceding_text": "o Ecclesiastical purposes. The wants of the Church must first be supplied.\" * The noble and learned Lord continued to observe, that \"he had followed that up by stating that those wants being provided for, any residue should be appropriated to a purpose which, though not strictly Ecclesiastical, was yet connected with the welfare of the Established Church, namely, the affording education.\"† "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/apr/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/apr/01/the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "section": "the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "cue_text": "Sir Henry Hardinge. —Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "ce or pluralities—is there not such a word as sinecures, also? I perceive that the right hon. Gentleman acquiesces; he, therefore, is friendly to the abolition of sinecures. Let us, then, inquire how far, in certain parts of the Church of Ireland, such things as sinecures contrive to exist? Upon the showing of the right hon. Gentleman himself, if they exist, I claim his vote for their extinction. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/apr/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/apr/01/the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "section": "the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "cue_text": "Cries of \"Adjourn,\" and \"No, no! \"", "preceding_text": "ient indulgence with which I have been honoured. Lord Stanley said, that he could assure the Gentlemen who were anxious to adjourn, it was a very natural desire at that period of the night [\"No, no! \"]. He was going to have said, that even if he had been otherwise disposed, he had not the physical strength that would enable him to trespass on their attention for more than a very short time "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/apr/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/apr/01/the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "section": "the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "cue_text": "A laugh", "preceding_text": "o, he (Lord Stanley) could not say, nor would he even hazard the suggestion that his silence might originate in the fear of producing some awkward difference of opinion among the present unanimous and well-cemented Opposition. Should he, and of course it was impossible to suppose any earthly consideration would induce him not to do so, lay before them the plain, unvarnished detail of his opinions—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/apr/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/apr/01/the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "section": "the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "cue_text": "\" Hear, hear\" and laughter from the Opposition.", "preceding_text": " to interfere with Church property; it had been already, during the present debate, most ably discussed by the right hon. the Solicitor-General, and the hon. Gentleman, the Under-Secretary for the Colonies, and his (Lord Stanley's) opinions upon it had been already placed before the House. Neither would he enter upon the case of Scotland, which had been brought forward by hon. Gentlemen opposite.—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/apr/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/apr/01/the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "section": "the-church-of-ireland-adjourned-debate", "cue_text": "Loud Cheers.", "preceding_text": "hon. the Solicitor-General, and the hon. Gentleman, the Under-Secretary for the Colonies, and his (Lord Stanley's) opinions upon it had been already placed before the House. Neither would he enter upon the case of Scotland, which had been brought forward by hon. Gentlemen opposite.—[\" Hear, hear\" and laughter from the Opposition. ]—Well, then, as hon. Gentlemen wished him, he would enter upon it.—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/jul/16", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/jul/16/corporation-reform-committee", "section": "corporation-reform-committee", "cue_text": "The Speaker intimated that the hon. Member was out of order.", "preceding_text": "ould not fail to institute a remedy.\" Now he was prepared to assert that the whole of that statement was utterly and entirely unfounded; and if the hon. Gentleman to whom it was attributed had taken the trouble, which every man who ventured to make such a statement was bound to take of first ascertaining the accuracy of the information upon which his observations were founded, he would have seen.—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/jul/16", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/jul/16/corporation-reform-committee", "section": "corporation-reform-committee", "cue_text": "Opposition cheers.", "preceding_text": "at part of the country the following came, further than that it was where freemen prevailed; but it was of a piece with what he had already read. The hon. Gentleman read as follows:—\"Brother freemen! The real object of this is to deprive us of our rights, and assist the Government to carry those Clauses in the Corporation Reform Bill , by which our children are to be robbed of their birthrights.\" "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/jul/21", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/jul/21/the-church-ireland-committee", "section": "the-church-ireland-committee", "cue_text": "Great noise and confusion .", "preceding_text": "ants within it, many parishes which would, even under this Bill, still retain pastoral care, would have been deprived of it by such a regulation as this. If the noble Lord's present proposition of limiting the supply of churches to parishes containing more than fifty Protestants had been in operation some years ago, many a Protestant population that now existed would never have been found at all. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/jul/21", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/jul/21/the-church-ireland-committee", "section": "the-church-ireland-committee", "cue_text": "Cries of \"Order, order\" —\" Chair, chair\" —\" Question, question. \"", "preceding_text": "re been brought into question. Thus much he would say, that in what the hon. Member had said in stating, in his attack upon him, that his interruption to the debates was more than that of others, he afforded him the opportunity of saying, that what that hon. Member had said was not the fact. § Mr. Nicholas Fitzsimon rose amidst much confusion, and said that he never trespassed on that House. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/jul/22", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/jul/22/ipswich-election-breach-of-privilege", "section": "ipswich-election-breach-of-privilege", "cue_text": "Renewed cries of \"Order, order,\" and loud calls upon the Earl of Darlington from the Ministerial benches.", "preceding_text": "r for Ipswich to order and to explain. § Mr. Wason The noble Lord had stated that I am actuated by vindictive feelings. I say this is untrue. If that is unparliamentary language, of course as unparliamentary language I retract it. How could the noble Lord possibly know the feelings which actuated his (Mr. Wason's) breast? He knew those feelings, and must repeat that the assertion was untrue. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/jul/22", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/jul/22/ipswich-election-breach-of-privilege", "section": "ipswich-election-breach-of-privilege", "cue_text": "Repeated cries of \"no, no,\" from the Opposition.", "preceding_text": "en he had got up to reply to the noble Lord's first observations, that he (Mr. Wason) was actuated by vindictive feelings, he bad said, that the noble Lord had been prompted by the hon. Member for Knaresborough, to which the noble Lord had replied, that it was false. Now, the hon. Member for Knaresborough had told the House, that it was true, for he had admitted that he did prompt the noble Lord. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/jun/10", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/jun/10/ipswich-election", "section": "ipswich-election", "cue_text": "Cries of \"Move.\"", "preceding_text": "et the charge brought against them by the Committee. He hoped, therefore, that his hon. Friend, the Member for Lancaster, in his capacity of Chairman of the Committee, would consider it his duty to move, that the Magistrates, Samuel Bignold, Esq. and E. T. Booth, Esq. be taken into custody, or that some independent Member would take the case up, if his hon. Friend thought fit to decline doing so. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/jun/24", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/jun/24/affairs-of-spain-orders-in-council", "section": "affairs-of-spain-orders-in-council", "cue_text": "Cries of \"Question!\"", "preceding_text": "ry troops. At all events he entreated his gallant Friend not to stir unless he carried with him the sinews of war. § Mr. Maclean saw no analogy between the two cases referred to by the hon. Member for Mary-la-bonne (Mr. H. Bulwer) namely, the return from Elba, and the furnishing of auxiliary troops by Elizabeth; he saw no analogy between these two cases and the case now under consideration. —"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/mar/12", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/mar/12/outrages-in-armagh-ireland", "section": "outrages-in-armagh-ireland", "cue_text": "Cries of \"Hear, hear!\" from the Opposition.", "preceding_text": "inion upon them until they were better acquainted with the facts than they were likely to be from the speeches of the hon. Members who had spoken on the other side of the House. They were continually hearing from the other side of the House of midnight outrages; and they were told, that as long as the present Government remained in office, there was safety for neither life or property in Ireland. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/mar/12", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/mar/12/outrages-in-armagh-ireland", "section": "outrages-in-armagh-ireland", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\" from Members opposite.", "preceding_text": " right that the only acknowledged friends of British connexion in Ireland should be the only persons who were to be deprived of the means of defence, and whether the handful, which they were said to be, were to be delivered over to the millions, of whom they heard such repeated boasts, to be sacrificed by them whenever the proper or convenient time might arrive, at the shrine of Repeal or Popery. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/mar/26", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/mar/26/london-university", "section": "london-university", "cue_text": "\"Oh,\" from Mr. Hume.", "preceding_text": " an occasion for going into the general question of the disabilities of Dissenters to enter the Universities, nor did he mean to say anything whatever that might be considered disrespectful to the Dissenting body. All he should deal with was, simply the Resolution before the House. He first objected to this Resolution, on the ground that it went to infringe the immediate prerogative of the Crown. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/mar/26", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/mar/26/london-university", "section": "london-university", "cue_text": "Cries of \"Question!\" and \"Divide.\"", "preceding_text": "still fairly confess that that part of it which had since grown up, and which was not contemplated by those by whom it was originally established—he meant education unaccompanied with religious instruction—he could not approve of. The right hon. Gentleman concluded by expressing his determination to vote for the Amendment moved by his right hon. Friend, the member for the University of Cambridge. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/mar/26", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/mar/26/london-university", "section": "london-university", "cue_text": "\"Hear, hear!\"", "preceding_text": "it should be accompanied with certain qualifications—they heard the evidence—they heard the speeches of counsel on both sides—they heard a very able speech from my learned Friend Sir Charles Wetherell—they heard a speech from the hon. and learned Gentleman opposite (Dr. Lushington)—they took the 294 whole subject into their consideration, but to this hour they have never given any opinion upon it "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/may/25", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/may/25/church-rates-mr-childs-case", "section": "church-rates-mr-childs-case", "cue_text": "Cheers.", "preceding_text": "rdly, and malignant calumnies against private individuals. To prove that he was not using language unsuitable to the occasion, he would call the attention of the House to the few but strong words with which the petition concluded:—\"Your petitioners, therefore, pray your hon. House to pass some measure for the immediate abolition of the barbarous and anomalous powers of the Ecclesiastical Courts.\" "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/may/25", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/may/25/agricultural-distress", "section": "agricultural-distress", "cue_text": "Cries of \"Read, Read.\"", "preceding_text": "n the Reports they made to the Government. But supposing there could be savings, would the House not listen to the means by which it had been brought about? Would they not ask how it had been effected? He would tell them. There was a union in Sussex of 36 parishes, of which the Duke of Richmond was the chairman. He held in his hand their printed bill of fare; let any Gentleman read that document. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/may/25", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/may/25/agricultural-distress", "section": "agricultural-distress", "cue_text": "loud laughter", "preceding_text": "g there could be savings, would the House not listen to the means by which it had been brought about? Would they not ask how it had been effected? He would tell them. There was a union in Sussex of 36 parishes, of which the Duke of Richmond was the chairman. He held in his hand their printed bill of fare; let any Gentleman read that document. [ Cries of \"Read, Read.\" ] Let them read it themselves "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/may/25", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/may/25/agricultural-distress", "section": "agricultural-distress", "cue_text": "Renewed cries of \"Read, Read.\"", "preceding_text": "k how it had been effected? He would tell them. There was a union in Sussex of 36 parishes, of which the Duke of Richmond was the chairman. He held in his hand their printed bill of fare; let any Gentleman read that document. [ Cries of \"Read, Read.\" ] Let them read it themselves [ loud laughter ], and they would see how the 103 savings were effected. This was the Duke of Richmond's bill of fare. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/may/25", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/may/25/agricultural-distress", "section": "agricultural-distress", "cue_text": "Cries of \"Read, Read.\"", "preceding_text": "f a boy, and Gentlemen who had boys of their own, would recollect that a boy of ten years of age, would eat as much as a man.—Now in the dietary of the Duke of Richmond, a boy of ten years of age, had on Sunday 12 ounces of bread made of flour which cost 5 s. a-bushel, half-a-pint of milk gruel, 7 ounces of rice, and another half-pint of milk gruel for supper. What was the Bill of fare for a man? "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1835/may/25", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1835/may/25/agricultural-distress", "section": "agricultural-distress", "cue_text": "amidst cries of \"Question\"", "preceding_text": " Bill and the measure of Municipal Reform. He agreed in the opinion expressed by the hon. Member for Oldham, that unless something was speedily done for the agriculturist, a convulsion must be the result, and he was satisfied that the relief most worthy of consideration, as best calculated to save the agricultural interest, was the introduction of a silver standard of currency. Mr. O'Connell said "}