{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/apr/29", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/apr/29/supply-report", "section": "supply-report", "cue_text": "MR. HADFIELD: Hear, hear.", "preceding_text": "ble to intrude their presence upon all the prisoners and inmates, whether they were asked for by these unfortunate captives or not. Now, he strongly objected to granting any such power, although he should be willing to afford them every assistance for obtaining access to all prisoners who really desired their ministrations. He thought that one Established Church was quite enough for this country. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/consideration-committee", "section": "consideration-committee", "cue_text": "An hon. MEMBER: Not in case of a scrutiny.", "preceding_text": "ple of the North of England; they were a fine, manly, frank race. They did not like much receiving compliments; and if they found they paid them compliments, and did not afterwards trust them, they would not attach much value to their compliments. The registration for the ensuing year was over, and they would be entitled to vote until the next registration, whatever might happen in the mean time. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/the-administration-of-viscount", "section": "the-administration-of-viscount", "cue_text": "Mr. HADFIELD: Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "view of our position with a view to seeing how far we shall be able to bear the inquest when the day comes—as come it will—for our conduct and character to be brought into judgment. Now, Sir, with regard to the majority, as I suppose we may on this side of the House call ourselves, I shall take the liberty of calling back to our recollection what has been in former times our professed principles. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/the-administration-of-viscount", "section": "the-administration-of-viscount", "cue_text": "\"Hear, hear!\"", "preceding_text": "hon. Gentleman opposite, so I give it here to make the comparison fair)—were set down at £29,916,000. Now, I have the Estimates of the right hon. Gentleman the Member for Buckinghamshire when he was Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1858, and his Estimates for 1858–9, for the army, navy, packet service, and fortifications, were £21,610,000, or £8,306,000 less than the Estimates for this year. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/the-administration-of-viscount", "section": "the-administration-of-viscount", "cue_text": "Loud cheers.", "preceding_text": " come, for instance, to ask a question about the introduction of a particular reform in this House, the answer I receive sometimes is, \"Nothing can be done while the noble Lord is at the head of the Government;\" but, assuming that he is as popular as he is said to be, I cannot imagine any other ground for that popularity than that he is supposed to be the vigilant guardian of the national safety. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/the-administration-of-viscount", "section": "the-administration-of-viscount", "cue_text": "\"No, no!\" \"Hear, hear!\"", "preceding_text": "on was committed by an American cruiser upon one of our steamers. Before the middle of December the noble Lord heard from the American Minister that the act was done without the instructions or the cognizance of the American Government, and that he had reason to believe that the whole thing would be explained and satisfactorily arranged. [\"No, no!\"] Yes, he had full reason to believe this. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/the-administration-of-viscount", "section": "the-administration-of-viscount", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "tion, \"You are in power without the responsibilities of office.\" And what a state of things is that? Do you think it can last? Will the country allow it to continue? I know that there are men on your side of the House who have confidence in the noble Lord, because they consider that he is as good a—I will not use the word Conservative, because I regard myself as much a Conservative as any of you. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/the-administration-of-viscount", "section": "the-administration-of-viscount", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\" \"Hear, hear!\" and cheers", "preceding_text": "of things is that? Do you think it can last? Will the country allow it to continue? I know that there are men on your side of the House who have confidence in the noble Lord, because they consider that he is as good a—I will not use the word Conservative, because I regard myself as much a Conservative as any of you. [\"Oh, oh!\"] I think I have been the most Conservative politician of my age—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/the-administration-of-viscount", "section": "the-administration-of-viscount", "cue_text": "\"Hear, hear!\"", "preceding_text": "o excuse the shortcomings which he does not deny, I will at least say for the Gentlemen who sit on this side of the House, that the past Session is a Session upon which they have no reason to look back to, as a party, with regret. We have, in the first place, this Session, after long years of difficulty, and sometimes almost of despair, triumphantly vindicated the status of the Church of England. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/question-5", "section": "question-5", "cue_text": "\"Hear, hear!\"", "preceding_text": "fense. It might be very well to be always armed and ready to inflict a blow on an enemy, if it cost nothing; but it cost a great deal of money. There was no one on the benches near him that would refuse any sum for the defense of the country. They would be fools if they did they had property in trade and commerce, and in everything that would be most injured by anything in the shape of an attack. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/bill-no-241-third-reading", "section": "bill-no-241-third-reading", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "it really required a great deal of study to know what the second clause meant. In consequence of the number of Amendments it had received, the whole clause had become a mere hotch-potch. To give an example of the carelessness with which it was drawn, the phrase \"every county, division, or borough in Great Britain and Ireland\" really meant some impossible place which was at once in both countries. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/01/bill-no-241-third-reading", "section": "bill-no-241-third-reading", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh !\"", "preceding_text": "t to come to the substance of the clause It contemplated two persons—the poacher and some one else who might be aiding and abetting him. Now, all that could be done to the principal offender was to arrest him and search him on the highway. The aider and abettor could also be searched, but only if he had game in his possession. In that case, any cart there might be with him might also be searched. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/04/observations", "section": "observations", "cue_text": "\"Order, order!\"", "preceding_text": " letter addressed to him (Mr. C. P. Villiers) Mr. Farnall called attention to the report of the speech in The Times —— § MR. SPEAKER said, the hon. Member was out of order in reading a letter with reference to a debate in the other House. 1198 § MR. C. P. VILLIERS I did not say the other House; I said \"another place.\" A noble Lord made a statement affecting the character of Mr. Farnall. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/aug/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/aug/04/observations", "section": "observations", "cue_text": "\"Order, order!\"", "preceding_text": "e replies to a statement which he considers erroneous, [\"Hear!\" and \"Order!\"] § MR. SPEAKER The right hon. Gentleman cannot read a letter commenting on a debate in the other House. § MR. C. P. VILLIERS When a public servant whose reports have been referred to in this House has been assailed, I thought that the House would allow me to make some statement in his vindication. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/03/questions-explanation", "section": "questions-explanation", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": ". It was a matter of indifference to me. I would feel obliged to any Member of the Committee to confirm my statement, if it is correct, that the Committee agreed that the words should be altered. Not expecting such a statement as the hon. Baronet has made to-night, I wrote the alteration with my own hand. I did not suspect anything, and therefore, unfortunately, I am open to his false accusation. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/03/bill-no-162-committee", "section": "bill-no-162-committee", "cue_text": "Mr. COWPER: Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "came before the Committee. He did think that the Committee had some little ground to complain of the right hon. Gentleman their Chairman. He should be very sorry to say anything hurtful to that right hon. Gentleman, for he presided over them with the greatest good temper; but he did not think that right hon. Gentleman appreciated the importance which the Committee attached to the alternative plan—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/03/bill-no-162-committee", "section": "bill-no-162-committee", "cue_text": "An hon. MEMBER: One in eighty.", "preceding_text": "to Parliament Street, it would be more for the public convenience; and his answer was, that it would be better to do so than to have all the traffic carried along the Thames to Westminster Bridge. Moreover, it was admitted that the embankment of the Thames should not be more than four feet above high-water mark; so that they would thus have an incline of one in thirty from the road to the bridge. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/03/bill-no-162-committee", "section": "bill-no-162-committee", "cue_text": "An hon. MEMBER: It was Mr. Gore.", "preceding_text": " all in the Committee. That gentleman was the architect of the Woods and Forests, and his having been brought into the matter reminded one of the old story of the British Museum and the Kensington Museum going to a sale and bidding against each other. There was the architect of the Woods and Forests coming before the Committee to say that he cared nothing at all about the interests of the public. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/03/bill-no-162-committee", "section": "bill-no-162-committee", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "ne's plan, and the protection of the property of the Crown lessees, he thought the way in which the Duke of Buccleuch was proposed to be treated should induce every man to stand up and demand fair play. Although he had not the honour of the Duke of Buccleuch's acquaintance, he must say, with all the natural inclination of an Englishman to stand up for the oppressed, that he had been very ill-used "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/03/bill-no-162-committee", "section": "bill-no-162-committee", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh! \"", "preceding_text": "uch's acquaintance, he must say, with all the natural inclination of an Englishman to stand up for the oppressed, that he had been very ill-used [\"Oh, oh!\"]—he repeated it, the Duke of Buccleugh had been ill-used. He firmly and conscientiously believed, that if the owner and resident in Montagu-house had been Brown, Jones, or Robinson, they would never have heard of this tremendous outcry. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/04/the-naval-commander-in-chief-in-india", "section": "the-naval-commander-in-chief-in-india", "cue_text": "Sir JOHN HAY: Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": " of the India and China station. § SIR JOHN HAY denied he had cast any reflection upon the gallant Admiral. § LORD CLARENCE PAGET , said he understood the hon. and gallant Gentleman to have said that he was not so distinguished an officer as others who had gone before him, and upon that point he must beg to differ with him. The gallant Admiral had greatly distinguished himself in China. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/04/bill-no-162-committee", "section": "bill-no-162-committee", "cue_text": "An hon. MEMBER: Read the next question.", "preceding_text": "g aside the question of public or private interests, he would advise getting on to the embankment near Westminster Bridge, or getting on to it near Whitehall Place; and his answer was—\"I think it would be very important that there should be an approach to it at Westminster Bridge, but I think (alluding to Mr. Pennethorne's plan) the other would, perhaps, be as good in effecting the whole object.\" "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/04/bill-no-162-committee", "section": "bill-no-162-committee", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "atepayers to make a roadway, and then to vote that the ratepayers should not ride along the road they had paid for. He should like to ask his hon. Friend and the other six members who composed the majority on the Committee, how they would explain to their constituents that they would not only impose the coal duties, but, in addition to doing so, would throw away the money when they had raised it. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jul/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jul/04/bill-no-162-committee", "section": "bill-no-162-committee", "cue_text": "An hon. MEMBER: No.", "preceding_text": "ged. I entirely agree, that if the arrangement which this clause professed to establish were carried out, it would, in the words of my hon. Friend (Sir Joseph Paxton), really make our legislation the laughing-stock of Europe. The first objection, which was urged and debated at great length last night, was the injury that it was proposed to do to the Crown lessees. That objection is now abandoned. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/business-of-the-house", "section": "business-of-the-house", "cue_text": "\"Order, order!\"", "preceding_text": "o ask, and I hope he has no reason to expect, that Gentlemen who sit on those benches so treated—when, he says there is no difference of opinion—should go with him into the lobby against what I call the definite but perfectly reasonable and judicious proposition of the right hon. Gentleman opposite. MR. ELLICE (Coventry) I thought the hon. Member for Birmingham would have concluded with a Motion. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/business-of-the-house", "section": "business-of-the-house", "cue_text": "Cries of Order! and Chair!", "preceding_text": "thought most useless expenditure. § COLONEL FRENCH I rise to order. The right hon. Member is now discussing prematurely a Motion which stands upon the books of the House. There is no Question before the House; for my noble Friend at the head of the Government, though he intimated his intention to conclude his speech with a Motion, did not do so. MR. ELLICE (Coventry) I am not going to debate—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/business-of-the-house", "section": "business-of-the-house", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "the House; for my noble Friend at the head of the Government, though he intimated his intention to conclude his speech with a Motion, did not do so. MR. ELLICE (Coventry) I am not going to debate—[ Cries of Order! and Chair!] § MR. SPEAKER All I can say is that the irregularity will become very great presently. MR. ELLICE (Coventry) Well, Sir, I move that this House do adjourn. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/business-of-the-house", "section": "business-of-the-house", "cue_text": "\"Order, order!\"", "preceding_text": "ll allow me to put the Motion, that the right hon. Gentleman who made it will immediately withdraw it, and that the hon. Member for Halifax will be allowed to proceed with his Motion. MR. ELLICE (Coventry) , expressed his readiness to withdraw his Motion. § Motion, by leave, withdrawn . § MR. ROEBUCK We shall adjourn tonight to meet to-morrow morning, which no hon. Member intends to do. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/resolution", "section": "resolution", "cue_text": "An hon. MEMBER: A few hours.", "preceding_text": "en exclusive 319 of India we had 43,167 men more than we had nine years ago:—to say nothing of 150,000 Volunteers, who had been declared by competent military authorities to be equal in many respects to the regular troops—to say nothing of the Militia and Yeomanry Cavalry. They were assured also that many thousands of these Volunteers could be concentrated on any doint of the coast in a few days. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/resolution", "section": "resolution", "cue_text": "Mr. HORSMAN: Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "nning of the evening. Gentlemen on the other side, the right hon. Gentleman especially, denied that there was any such intention. No, the Amendment, according to them, was proposed simply for the public good, and to enforce a strict regard for proper economy. But 332 what said my right hon. Friend the Member for Stroud? Why, he said that it was an expression of distrust in the present Government. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/resolution", "section": "resolution", "cue_text": "Mr. WHITE: Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "oes not, I think, require further refutation. But the hon. Member for Halifax, and still more the hon. Member for Montrose (Mr. Baxter), went into the question of our naval and military Estimates. They gave us their facts and their history upon that subject, founding the whole of their conclusions, as usual, upon the assumption that all our increased expenditure proceeded from panic and delusion. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/resolution", "section": "resolution", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh! \"", "preceding_text": " of amity with that country in any other way than by maintaining heavy armaments. I speak now of those in preparation for an attack from France. I have often said—and I repeat it here only for the purpose of making a suggestion—better by far than to allow yourselves to appear to be forced to reduce your armaments by mere poverty, go to France and talk over the subject of these iron-cased vessels. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/resolution", "section": "resolution", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": " in which all classes are concerned, and which affects all the various interests of the nation. The first thing to be affected is that industry which is now in the greatest peril, and which more than anything else carried us through the great war with France, and has been the main source of your prosperity ever since. Depend upon it, if the cotton industry falls everything else will fall with it. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/resolution", "section": "resolution", "cue_text": "\"Hear, hear!\" \"No, no!\"", "preceding_text": "pole) and the course which he felt it his duty to take, and also against the view which was taken by an hon. Gentleman opposite (Mr. B. Osborne) on the same subject. It is true that the course which events have taken this evening have reduced to a solemn farce that which ought to have been a serious debate. But to whom is that owing? It is owing not to my right hon. Friend, but to the noble Lord. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/03", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/03/resolution", "section": "resolution", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "ed to-night. I will give no opinion on that. Let every person who reads the newspapers to-morrow judge of our position. But this I say, that this financial subject remains open; it awaits discussion; discussion some time or other is inevitable, and you will then approach it without the prejudices with which it would have been approached if my right hon. Friend had not exercised a wise discretion. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/05", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/05/distress-in-cork-observations", "section": "distress-in-cork-observations", "cue_text": "Sir ROBERT PEEL: Hear, hear.", "preceding_text": "f the country. I cannot at all agree in the attack that has been made on the Irish portion of the Administration. It has been stated that ray right hon. Friend the Chief Secretary for Ireland said in his place in this House that there was no distress in Ireland. Sir, I was present on each occasion when the subject was under discussion, and I can state positively that he never said any such thing. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/05", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/05/supply-civil-service-estimates", "section": "supply-civil-service-estimates", "cue_text": "\"Order, order!\"", "preceding_text": " of assistant, Parliament was asked to make up the salary of the Registrar to a larger amount. He saw no reason why this Vote should not remain at £5,000. § MR. VINCENT SCULLY said, he was not at all surprised that the hon. Member for Montrose (Mr. Baxter) should support this Vote; for the next Vote was for the Scottish Universities, which it was proposed to increase from £16,000 to £20,000. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/27", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/27/question-observations", "section": "question-observations", "cue_text": "\"Order, order!\"", "preceding_text": "ainst that allegation. He hoped that no Member of that House would be so base or so mean as to be actuated by any such motives, and certainly he could answer that no Member of the Committee would be. The convenience of the Duke of Buccleuch was never once considered. It was on public grounds that the Committee determined to recommend that the embankment should commence below the Whitehall Stairs. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/jun/27", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/jun/27/question-observations", "section": "question-observations", "cue_text": "Several hon. MEMBERS: Why?", "preceding_text": "e closed, he did not suppose, and he did not now believe there was any reason why information relating to that evidence should be withheld. Therefore after the proceedings were all concluded, he picked up two or three papers of evidence which were lying in the committee-room, and sent them to Mr. Higgins, thinking it would he advantageous that he should have correct notions of what had been said. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1862/mar/18", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1862/mar/18/education-science-and-art-estimates", "section": "education-science-and-art-estimates", "cue_text": "A laugh", "preceding_text": "in proof of his case, for the state of the National Gallery when it was under trustees was perfectly intolerable. But since 1855 there had been a change; the trustees were made to approach more nearly to the position of visitors, and the National Gallery had materially improved. Then the Kensington Museum was really a case in point, where there was thorough vigour, efficiency, and responsibility. "}