{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/apr/09", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/apr/09/vote-on-account", "section": "vote-on-account", "cue_text": "\"Oh. oh!\"", "preceding_text": "ight hon. Gentleman said on this subject, because my conscience was very easy on the matter, for I felt that a great deal of the public money which 528 we spent was expended in consequence of the neglect of our predecessors in Office, in not keeping up the public service in a proper state of efficiency. I can quite understand that the ignorant audience whom the right hon. Gentleman was addressing—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/apr/09", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/apr/09/vote-on-account", "section": "vote-on-account", "cue_text": "\"Hear, hear!\"", "preceding_text": " alluded, among other things, to the debate on the Motion of my hon. Friend the Member for Chippenham; and one of the chief counts in his indictment against the late Government was that they had opposed that Motion. So important were the utterances of the right hon. Gentleman, that they exist not only in the shape of a newspaper report, but have been bound up together and published in a pamphlet. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/apr/29", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/apr/29/committee-progress-26th-april", "section": "committee-progress-26th-april", "cue_text": "Opposition cheers.", "preceding_text": " Established Church of Ireland because it corresponded with his private convictions in religion, or because it was the national Established religion of the country—and that is no unimportant distinction. I suspect that if we were to examine these private endowments we should find there were multitudes of them given to the national Established Church because it was the national Established Church. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/apr/29", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/apr/29/committee-progress-26th-april", "section": "committee-progress-26th-april", "cue_text": "Opposition cheers.", "preceding_text": "n deputation from the General Assembly of Ulster, and the demand put forward by them was that we should not stop at 1660, but go behind that date. \"Upon what ground do you ask that?\" I inquired. \"Upon this ground,\" they replied. \"that if you can go back so as to bring in the glebes of the Ulster settlement, we, the Presbyterians, shall be in a position to claim a large share in those endowments.\" "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/apr/29", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/apr/29/committee-progress-26th-april", "section": "committee-progress-26th-april", "cue_text": "Opposition cheers.", "preceding_text": " evident that neither in policy nor in justice can such a proposal be entertained by us. We cannot assent to the pre-Reformation endowments re- 1910 maining the property of the present Irish Church after it has passed into a state of disestablishment. Observe what we should do if we agreed to go back to the reign of James I. The Presbyterians would claim a share in the Crown grants of that reign. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/apr/29", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/apr/29/committee-progress-26th-april", "section": "committee-progress-26th-april", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "fess to establish that fact is one which no human ingenuity could make good. If a justification of it were possible it would have been placed before us by my right hon. Friend. § THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR IRELAND (Mr. SULLIVAN) thought that when they came to examine the argument of the hon. and learned Member for Richmond (Sir Roundell Palmer) he would show that it was utterly unmaintainable. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/apr/29", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/apr/29/committee-progress-26th-april", "section": "committee-progress-26th-april", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "ablished 1915 Church was not adopted by Ireland, but was forced by conquest upon the people of that country, and no Protestant historian of any authority had ever written who had not pronounced that opinion. No one but a person whose wits had been overturned by prejudice would state, in the face of intelligent men, that the Irish people belonged to the Protestant Church in the reign of Elizabeth. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/apr/29", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/apr/29/committee-progress-26th-april", "section": "committee-progress-26th-april", "cue_text": "\" Order.\"", "preceding_text": "exist it would be extremely inconsistent if those public grants were treated as though they were of a private nature. For these reasons he hoped the Committee would not agree to the Amendment. § MR. CONOLLY hoped the right hon. Gentleman would not deny that his hon. Friend (Sir Frederick Heygate) was Member for the county of Londonderry, because his audacious—he would not say insolent—denial—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "lords/1869/apr/29", "house": "lords", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1869/apr/29/second-reading-1", "section": "second-reading-1", "cue_text": "Lord CAIRNS: Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "to the Governor General to declare war against a border State would not require the assent of the Council, though, of course, it would in its consequences involve expenditure. Surely his noble and learned Friend could not mean to say that all the powers heretofore exercised by the Board of Control could not be exercised by the Secretary of State without the consent of the majority of the Council? "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "lords/1869/apr/29", "house": "lords", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1869/apr/29/second-reading-1", "section": "second-reading-1", "cue_text": "Lord CAIRNS was understood to say that he did not withdraw his opinion.", "preceding_text": " veto any measure of the Secretary of State upon questions of that kind by the votes of a majority; and this furnished one test of the incorrectness of the interpretation which the noble Marquess had put upon the law. The noble and learned Lord opposite (Lord Cairns) had expressed his belief that the Secretary of State could not declare war 1836 without the consent of the majority of the Council. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/feb/18", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/feb/18/first-reading", "section": "first-reading", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": " to the important measures which the Government had taken in hand. § LORD ROBERT MONTAGU added Ms protest to that of other hon. Members against the course which it was proposed to adopt with respect to this Bill. It was of great magnitude and importance, and if it were to have any effect at all it would determine the character, and therefore the future history, of the people of this country. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/jun/01", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/jun/01/motion-for-a-select-committee", "section": "motion-for-a-select-committee", "cue_text": "Laughter.", "preceding_text": "be dirty, because the last man who slept in them had only committed an assault. He asked to be allowed to wear his trousers during the night, but was refused, and stripped naked to search him, and his clothes, with the exception of his shirt, wove thrown outside the cell. He could not sleep in consequence of the thinness of the covering, and had to get out of his bed during the night with cramps. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "lords/1869/jun/01", "house": "lords", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1869/jun/01/removal-of-municipal-magistrates-question", "section": "removal-of-municipal-magistrates-question", "cue_text": "Loud cries of 'Hear, hear,' and continued cheering,", "preceding_text": "ey had disavowed the statements attributed to the Prime Minister. Mr. O'Sullivan had not been silent since his resignation. In a recent speech he had said— Let any man look to the meaning of Mr. Bright's speech on the Irish Church question delivered within the last fortnight. What is the meaning of that speech? It is this—that the land of Ireland is to be handed over to the people of the country. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "lords/1869/jun/15", "house": "lords", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1869/jun/15/debate-resumed-second-night", "section": "debate-resumed-second-night", "cue_text": "Earl RUSSELL: Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "e sake of peace and of averting ail those evils which they foresaw from a struggle between the two Houses; but. unfortunately, this House was ill-advised enough to reject the Bill; and when a new Bill came before you in the next year—my noble Friend (Earl Russell) will bear me out in saying so—the Government no longer had the power, even if they had the wish, to agree to any important Amendments, "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "lords/1869/jun/15", "house": "lords", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1869/jun/15/debate-resumed-second-night", "section": "debate-resumed-second-night", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": " this point— that if the remarks which I venture to make should be distasteful to some of your Lordships, I shall be at least free to make them. I am reminded that your political education is imperfect; but I am glad to find that you have not yet adopted the most recent form of Parliamentary clâture, which simply consists in howling down the person who takes the unpopular side in a debate. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "lords/1869/jun/15", "house": "lords", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/lords/1869/jun/15/debate-resumed-second-night", "section": "debate-resumed-second-night", "cue_text": "\"Hear, hear!\"", "preceding_text": "\" as applied to the decision at the hustings. It seems to me that the duty of the voters at the hustings is not to pass laws, but to choose legislators. It is, in my opinion, rather tending in a revolutionary direction to talk of the hasty and impassioned verdict at the hustings as the deliberate verdict of the nation. I should rather call it the empanelling the jury which is to give the verdict. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/mar/23", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/mar/23/second-reading-adjourned-debate-fourth", "section": "second-reading-adjourned-debate-fourth", "cue_text": "Ministerial cheers.", "preceding_text": " rules, directions, and conditions, nothing can entitle you, either in reason or in justice, to take it away, unless you can show that the property has been so perverted and abused that the State has a right to resume it. Sir, I have heard it said that there is a distinction between the property in this case and other corporate property, inasmuch as it came to the Church by conquest and by wrong. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/mar/23", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/mar/23/second-reading-adjourned-debate-fourth", "section": "second-reading-adjourned-debate-fourth", "cue_text": "Cheers.", "preceding_text": "ng discontent and of redressing the grievances under which they labour. I regret that such should be the case. Now when I say that such and such results will follow from the action of the right hon. Gentleman at the head of her Majesty's Government, I am told—\"You are suggesting these things and putting them in the minds of people, and for any injury to the Church of England you are responsible.\" "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/mar/23", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/mar/23/second-reading-adjourned-debate-fourth", "section": "second-reading-adjourned-debate-fourth", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "at least, I will venture to say he knows not the sentiment in the Irish Church on the subject. But it has been our duty to make inquiry into the matter, and the truth is that, consistently with the very sentiments expressed by the right hon. Gentleman near me, and which he thinks we have abjured, we do attach conditions of service to the annuities of incumbents for the sake of their congregations—"}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/may/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/may/04/question-2", "section": "question-2", "cue_text": "\"Order.\"", "preceding_text": "on he had to ask with regard to the language attributed to the Mayor of Cork, in order that the Government might give a definite and deliberate reply. He had no intention to repeat the nauseating words, which were by this time known to every hon. Member in that House, and which had been published in every newspaper in the Kingdom. He had seen no satisfactory retraction of the phrases in question. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/may/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/may/04/committee-progress-3rd-may", "section": "committee-progress-3rd-may", "cue_text": "Mr. GLADSTONE: Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": "id not intend to take away the Maynooth Grant and the Regium Donum. The right hon. Gentleman stated, in reply, that not only his own declarations on many occasions, but a Resolution unanimously passed by the House of Commons bound him in honour as he was bound in purpose and conviction; and he added that the Regium Donum and the Maynooth Grant should be wound up and cease. Could words go farther? "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/may/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/may/04/committee-progress-3rd-may", "section": "committee-progress-3rd-may", "cue_text": "A laugh", "preceding_text": " in the institutions of this country, and giving the stamp of 110 Imperial sanction to that armoury by which the Roman Catholic Church had at one time dominated over the world, and by which, according to Dr. Manning, she was to dominate over it again, taking Ireland as her starring point. Chrurch of England Protestants were opposed to the College of Maynooth, and ordinary Protestants like himself "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/may/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/may/04/committee-progress-3rd-may", "section": "committee-progress-3rd-may", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "as religious equality. They could not have religious equality any more than they could have political equality or social equality. What they could have, however, was religious toleration. He put it to hon. Gentlemen opposite, whether, even if it were possible, they would have religious equality by the passing of this clause. Let them go to Italy and to Spain, and study the state of affairs there. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/may/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/may/04/committee-progress-3rd-may", "section": "committee-progress-3rd-may", "cue_text": "\"Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": "lections would have been different. The right hon. Gentleman at the head of the Government had said, in the most emphatic manner, that he would not do that which the right hon. Gentleman opposite had asserted that it would have been quite reasonable for them to do. The issue was this—that Parliament understood from the right hon. Gentleman last year that the Maynooth Grant Act would be abolished. "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/may/04", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/may/04/committee-progress-3rd-may", "section": "committee-progress-3rd-may", "cue_text": "The ATTORNEY GENERAL for IRELAND: Hear, hear!", "preceding_text": ", who, no doubt, would take it settled with a trust for the purposes of the institution. The president and vice-president wished the proposed addition to be made in order to 134 show that the individual interests were a charge upon the bulk sum. MR. HENLEY Would the right hon. Gentleman pledge himself to Parliament that no claim on the country should afterwards arise on account of this provision? "}
{"kind": "bracketed_cue_html", "date": "commons/1869/may/27", "house": "commons", "url": "https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1869/may/27/customs-and-inland-revenue-duties-bill", "section": "customs-and-inland-revenue-duties-bill", "cue_text": "''Oh, oh!\"", "preceding_text": " that the dog belonged to the shepherd, and the object was to relieve the shepherd from a liability to which he would otherwise be subject. The master, on hiring a shepherd, would inquire whether he had already obtained a licence; if not, the master would have to pay for it. MR. HENLEY said, the consequence would be that a master would have to pay for a dog whether his shepherd needed one or not. "}